California’s new answerableness system originated within the radical decentralization of power and authority from state capital to native colleges and their communities led to by the Legislature’s adoption of the native management Funding Formula (LCFF) in 2013.
beneath California’s previous answerableness policies and therefore the federal “No kid Left Behind” law, the state set performance targets for colleges and districts primarily based nearly entirely on students’ standardized check scores. colleges that fell in need of their targets were subject to a spread of more and more harsh sanctions, starting from designation as a “failing” college to reconstitution or closure.
California’s new answerableness system is totally different from the previous system in nearly each necessary respect. The new system is grounded within the idea of reciprocal accountability: that’s, each actor within the system—from the Capitol to the classroom—must be answerable for the aspects of instructional quality and performance that it controls.
To pursue purposeful learning for college kids – through the adoption of latest standards and information frameworks a lot of targeted on higher order thinking and performance abilities;
To give colleges and districts the resources and suppleness they have to serve their communities effectively – through the new LCFF, that allocates funds supported student wants and permits communities to work out wherever the funds ought to be spent to attain the simplest results.
To provide skilled learning and supports for academics and directors – through stronger preparation and in progress skilled development. At a similar time, the state has adopted 3 complementary mechanisms to carry colleges and districts accountable:
Political answerableness, operationalized through native management answerableness Plans (LCAPs), created by districts with their communities, updated annually, and reviewed by county agencies. The LCAPs, supposed to make sure that resources ar used sagely and effectively, articulate native goals for schooling and report outcomes.